Like, Google is aware of the context of my searches and it always returns good results. If I’m looking for info on bash, for example, it’s not going to show me videos of street fights, I’ll get StackOverflow pages on the bash Linux shell.
-
Show this thread
-
Anyway: the thing about this stuff is that it runs on ACCURATE data. The worst fucking thing about data analysis is when your data is corrupted or inaccurate, and you have no way of filtering it out. It means insights derived from the dataset are 100% junk.
14 replies 279 retweets 3,235 likesShow this thread -
Now, other thing to know is that zoomers and millennials are THE tech savvy people and I would hazard a guess that the vast majority know how internet advertising works. They know about the data tracking.
11 replies 198 retweets 3,120 likesShow this thread -
Probably not in any detail but the use of fake social media profiles and fake emails specifically to make advertising data worthless is a thing going back years. So the troll operation in this case, by all accounts, used fake emails and temp Google Voice numbers.
5 replies 263 retweets 3,150 likesShow this thread -
And listen, people: you don’t know how fucking genius this is. I will bet a month’s salary that some poor database admin is now staring at a dataset of over a million ticket reservations that they were going to use to shill for donations and feeling sick.
60 replies 1,072 retweets 7,048 likesShow this thread -
Not even just donations: I’d bet they were planning on using this data to cross reference against other sources and do additional micro-targeting. Let’s say they were going to use it to ID moderates to advertise to them.
6 replies 230 retweets 3,426 likesShow this thread -
They might have planned to ID any Democrat trolls and just slide that particular subset on to someone who can fuck with voter registrations. Or cross-reference signals on location, and determine how to direct their campaign spending based on that.
6 replies 199 retweets 2,505 likesShow this thread -
Anyway - point being, they were probably expecting some level of trolling but not this. That dataset is probably complete junk. Any registration that doesn’t correlate somehow to known good information is now suspect.
12 replies 258 retweets 3,593 likesShow this thread -
Like, for voters who they have a profile on already, like committed MAGAts, they can probably select them out and add this data point to the profile for future use, but novel signups? The thing that Parscale was bragging about IIRC? Junk.
4 replies 193 retweets 3,118 likesShow this thread -
You can’t tell the difference between a legit email/phone number and a fake email/Google Voice number. By automated means, is what I’m saying. Obviously if the email is “http://Trump.sucks .putins.balls@gmail.com” that’s a pretty safe bet for being fake.
39 replies 164 retweets 2,859 likesShow this thread
Wait, you just outed my email.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.