Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
For those who aren't familiar, one of Lomborg's shticks for climate inaction is to analyze a partial or intermediate measure against hugely pessimistic costs and claim there's no benefit to mitigating action- that it's better to suffer through. He's doing it now for COVID-19 toohttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1263495512856068098 …
Proposed policy responses to COVID-19 involve not just social restrictions, but also unprecedented economic interventions, which not only would cut into the GPD/education losses but could be designed to reduce inequality and cement long term mortality improvements.
And absent from the conversation entirely is anything about the structural factors putting Malawi in the economic position it was in prior to the pandemic and tools to address this.
Also, friendly reminder that Lomborg's "Copenhagen Consensus Center" was, the last time I checked, a PO Box in Massachusetts, because the Danish government had enough of his chicanery and pulled its funding.
There needs to be a character like him in whatever superhero film is in the works.
Fiction has to seem believable. Reality is under no such restriction.
Deniers (or lukewarmers or whatever they say) often profess to have poor folk's best interests at heart.... I for one remain to be convinced by these displays of compassion.
We have plenty of resources to do both those things; the refusal to do so is a choice.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
