Does no one (ignorant of modern historiography on late antiquity/early middle ages) stop to think as they lament the barbarians, that "western history" has always tended to look for its roots in the barbarian west (Francia, Britannia, Germany) and not surviving Roman Byzantium?
-
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Erik Jensen has a new book on what "barbarians" mean to Greeks and Romans and it's probably not what you think.https://www.amazon.com/Barbarians-Greek-Roman-World-Jensen/dp/1624667120/ref=sr_1_1 …
Deze collectie tonen -
I'll further say that Rome spent centuries incorporating people who had been considered barbarians, from Spain, North Africa, Arabia, Germania, and elsewhere. The elite of the "Roman" world by the late third century were by and large not ancestrally "Roman," or even Italian.
Deze collectie tonen -
If you're a white European, you're probably a descendent of some kind of Roman-era barbarian. It is unlikely you think that this is a bad thing. Why would people of the future care about this either?
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
One thing often left out in these narratives is the role of civil strife within the Roman Empire that made such invasions possible. Events like the Imperial Crisis made the Empire weak and ripe to be invaded and for Rome to be sacked.
-
Multiple times! The third century was a disaster, in part because there was no real legitimate way to keep an emperor in power (short of winning battles) and no legitimate way to ensure a peaceful succession.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Anyone whoever read Obelix and Asterix knows this.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
I’m an Ostrogoth.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
Archives.