Many have asked if the House managers can move for a mistrial. Here are my quick thoughts: I wish Schiff WOULD make a motion for a mistrial based on, among other things, the revelation of Cipollone’s grossly unethical conduct/conflicts of interest. I wouldn’t be deterred that...https://twitter.com/survivingmyway/status/1223969647864745990 …
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
the Senate rules may not contemplate/authorize a mistrial motion. I would argue the rules as adopted NEVER contemplated the president’s lawyers would have hidden from the Senate, the Chief Justice and the American people such egregious, disqualifying information (as recently
41 reply 943 proslijeđena tweeta 3.519 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
disclosed by John Bolton). Cipollone perpetrated a unimaginable fraud on the Senate and the American people and the Dems should not go quietly into that dark acquittal. Move for a mistrial and see what the Chief Justice says.
240 replies 1.937 proslijeđenih tweetova 5.667 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
Aside from Cipollone, we also heard information that several Republican Senators received donations from Trump's campaign. How can that be, not only ethical, but legal?
@RepAdamSchiff@SpeakerPelosi25 proslijeđenih tweetova 44 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
I heard the Gopers who received donations from trumps legal team were Graham, MCConnell, Cruz possibly others.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.