1/
Over past 30 days @bitfinex processed in terms of percentage of tx count [dep/wd] (for #bitcoin
related transactions).
60% #Bitcoin (L1)
34% #LightningNetwork 
5% @Liquid_BTC
1% RSK
Show this thread
-
2/ In terms of tx value [dep/wd] 98%
#Bitcoin (L1)
1.5% @Liquid_BTC 0.45%#LightningNetwork
0.05% RSKShow this thread
3/ This shows (at least in Finex's case) that: - LN is used a lot for micro-transactions - L-BTC is used for bigger transactions than LN as expected - BTC-L1 is still the most used transport layer - there is a lot of space for growth for L2
-
-
Or, maybe, that there is no real need for a L2 yet. As I write, the mempool is empty (133 transactions), 1 sat/byte is enough to enter in the first block
-
There is a real need for L2. We don't sit at the current mempool all the time. Go look at where it was in May. Beyond scaling, there are real UX advantages to the Lightning experience that on-chain just lacks.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is really good info Paolo thanks for sharing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you share some info on the costs of running and maintaining liquidity on the LN and the L-BTC ramps? How those compare vs. on-chain transactions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.