#tether
is considered more like a disruptor, than a risk. As usual a clickbait title by coindesk...https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1408595964735131650 …
Show this thread
-
-
A more clear tldr...https://twitter.com/paoloardoino/status/1408690958951137285?s=19 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The risk of ... being successful ...
-
Yup. Successful projects are hurting too many people's feelings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Being a “disruptor” isn’t inherently good, it’s just way of classifying the activity as novel and competitive. Disruption also carries risk with it, the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Regulators aren’t obliged to permit all disruption if they don’t see sufficient upside.
-
It’s not a good signal to the market that you’re unable to properly interpret basic statements from a regulator and communicate about risk properly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t the header “three financial stability challenges?”
-
Yes. But disruptor is used in context of something that can change the equilibriums and needs to be monitored to understand how it can fit. Not a "omg what the hell is that"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The CEO of Tether needs to make an appearance and quash these rumours. No offence to you Paolo, but the CTO isn’t the person who should be the face of the company. It’s suspicious. Where are Giancarlo and JL?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.