This might have interesting repercussions. While we're staring at laundering while it happens on a transparent DEX, couple of consideratios arise for me: - will liquidity providers be tainted? - privacy is key, probably the next DEX should use confidential transactionshttps://twitter.com/lawmaster/status/1310129344245903362 …
-
I think it would be silly if LP's assets become tainted. Most logical step is that the OCEAN he dumped is no longer tainted and the ETH he got now gets tainted. Hency why I don't consider it money laundering until some sort off mixing is involved.
I see your point. Somehow it still might look like as facilitating laundering stolen assets. It would be interesting to get some lawyer providing an opinion. I just fix printers
-
-
law student here; uncharted waters afaik. But in property law depending on jurisdiction, if you purchase land honestly not knowing it was fraudulently transferred it can’t be taken from you But the money the fraudster received can be taken from them. I think
@lawmaster is right. -
Well. But since this issue now is public I'm wondering how this will change. Potentially you're knowingly providing liquidity to an hacker. The more time it passes the more difficult is to argue you were 100% unaware.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.