Use #DeFi projects at your own risk but if you do, at least make sure to user @Tether_to $USDt.
1M $USDt recovered and returned to the legitimate owner(s).
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0b44bf8681cbfb337f1c0f5bdb2b662a070e29eb204ec848a575c8dc3549413e …https://twitter.com/paoloardoino/status/1303239384037289986 …
-
-
Replying to @paoloardoino @Tether_to
Is this recovery feature also available on
@Liquid_BTC?@richardbensberg@Excellion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gr0kch8n @paoloardoino and
I don’t think it’s a feature, but more like a proof of burn to the issuer. Anyone issuing their asset on Liquid can determine their own policies.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Excellion @paoloardoino and
Gr0kchain 🇿🇦 🤘 South Africa Retweeted Richard Bensberg
Yeah, similar to the rules for the ERC20 version. Cannot do a chargeback, but can burn and remint. Is the same true for the tether version on Liquid.
@richardbensberg seemed to suggest this was not the casehttps://twitter.com/richardbensberg/status/1303313192551100416 …Gr0kchain 🇿🇦 🤘 South Africa added,
Richard Bensberg @richardbensbergReplying to @gr0kch8n @bitfinexA company can't burn coins (read: a list of digital signatures) which they do not have custody of. They can always refuse to honor a redemption on *any* coins so you will never have true censorship resistance, but with CT the fungibility is such that this is largely impractical.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gr0kch8n @Excellion and
TL;DR; Considering that tether is a product of
@bitfinex, has their implementation on@Liquid_BTC been written to burn and optionally remint tokens when needing to confiscate, chargeback, reverse or censor any transactions using it? Is the source for this freely available?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gr0kch8n @paoloardoino and
No, they cannot burn tokens they don’t have. The user in the above case effectively burnt it themselves and Tether got the proof from them and reissued.
@paoloardoino correct me if I am wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Excellion @gr0kch8n and
On Liquid we can't do such operations. The only solution would be requiring, for each transfer, an additional signature provided by a Tether watchtower. Such system would allow Tether to "freeze" funds. But burns of tokens on specific addresses are not possible.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @paoloardoino @gr0kch8n and
If a user does make some mistake and screws up a transfer, could they provide the blinding key, and Tether would help them recover (or accept it was burned) and re-issue?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yes. That would be the smart option
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.