Nice
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bitcoin is not volatile enough to get an ETF
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are no good-enough legal or investment reasons not to approve a Bitcoin ETF. See this thread. https://twitter.com/gaborgurbacs/status/1251209707693490177?s=21 …https://twitter.com/gaborgurbacs/status/1251209707693490177 …
-
no need for ETF. let the banksters play their games in their oil sandbox
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m thinking of floating a USDT ETF.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Once you have Tethers, you can trade them, keep them, or use them to pay persons that will accept your Tethers. Tethers are not money They are also not stored value or currency. We do not guarantee any right of redemption or exchange of Tethers by us for money.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yea and apparently clearing firms lost about $500 million yesterday which as I understand is about $350 million less than you guys "misplaced". Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
-
And not pick on finex but file this tweet under the "dont throw stones in glasses houses" section. But I do think its a joke there is no true BTC ETF yet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Probs oil - too volatile
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
