maybe buy You'd lose out on confidential asset if the asset is always the same, and I'm not sure each asset should have it's own chain, you'd lose interoperability with wallets, explorer, and in general third parties (i.e. Bisq) etc
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I think also atomic swaps, unless their available cross-sidechain
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Does elements support atomics between sidechains? Did not know that
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paoloardoino @timoncc and
There's a contrib python script bitcoin <-> elements hash-lock cross chain swap. cross-chain swaps tend to be a bit more complex and less flexible than in-chain atomic swap (which is just a multi asset transacton with no hash-lock) eg in liquid swap tool.https://github.com/Simplexum/python-elementstx/blob/master/examples/confidential-cross-chain-atomic-swap.py …
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Yep it makes sense done in this way. Still I prefer Tether to be on the main Liquid chain.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @timoncc @paoloardoino and
Two paths to tether on lightning: c-lightning on L-USDt and further development of RGB/spectrum Lightning friendly color coin layer.
4 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
RGB on c-lightning will run before end of year
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.