maybe buy You'd lose out on confidential asset if the asset is always the same, and I'm not sure each asset should have it's own chain, you'd lose interoperability with wallets, explorer, and in general third parties (i.e. Bisq) etc
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Does elements support atomics between sidechains? Did not know that
-
-
There's a contrib python script bitcoin <-> elements hash-lock cross chain swap. cross-chain swaps tend to be a bit more complex and less flexible than in-chain atomic swap (which is just a multi asset transacton with no hash-lock) eg in liquid swap tool.https://github.com/Simplexum/python-elementstx/blob/master/examples/confidential-cross-chain-atomic-swap.py …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cross chain swaps have different tradeoffs, mostly that you need more complex setup mechanisms to lock up, and recovery mechanics. The nice thing about single chain swaps is it's just one transaction and done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.