Most #decentralized and #censorship resistant social media proposals that I see around lately have same downsides as DEXes.
-
2 main issues - centralized interest: 1 entity deploys a solution to make money = single point of attack - asymmetric risk: data hosts bear a big risk, storing potentially dangerous content, even if encrypted Solutions are P2P protocols, token agnostic and risk symmetric
-
-
Right, still need curation - maybe decentralize the curation process? E.g. do the whole flag content as illegal & accounts as spam but via an open court-like governance mechanism?
-
Harder to avoid centralized interest esp with advertising being dominant biz model. If content is decentralized, anyone can make their own UI and direct all $$ flows to themselves. But then data storage = free rider. Maybe this requires incentived data storage as a primitive?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.