Shouldn't you level up the quality and ethics rather then level yourself to bloomberg?
-
-
Replying to @paoloardoino
As long as both sides of the argument are presented (which they were), it’s fair game to report on it IMO. When the paper wasn’t peer reviewed, it was a little bit different but Journal of Finance is a prestigious journal. If it’s nonsense, we will report on that too
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lawmaster
Sure. Did not say do not report stuff, just if you report something you should give complete information to the public, otherwise to certain eyes might seem sloppy journalism
. Just saying, and it's not only to me or my friends btw.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @paoloardoino
What do you think it’s missing? Happy to relay to the journalist
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lawmaster
Am I not seeing it or the paper is not linked anywhere? I think it's kind of the most important thing to see no?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @paoloardoino
It's not published yet. And again, it's standard practice to report on yet to be published peer-reviewed papers if they are exclusively shared with a publication. This is not just a case for reporting on Tether. Check Bloomberg, WSJ, FT and others
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawmaster
Naaaa, I think that you, among everyone, being a data analyst, should understand the importance of first hand data. This was just a click-bait article in fear of leaving that game only to bloomberg. But I still like you
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @paoloardoino @lawmaster
Readers pay the block to get timely information they can act on. If The Block fails to report and then
$LEO tanks based on expectation of this paper dropping (bullshit or not), then they’re not doing their job. Do you agree?5 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @udiWertheimer @paoloardoino
Yep, that’s exactly how I look at it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawmaster @paoloardoino
Of course, if you guys really want to give your readers the complete picture, I’d also note in the piece that these accusations aren’t new and were raised multiple times in the past, and the usual counterargument that was given when that happened
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I also accepted to be on their podcast because there are couple of people I find reasonable in that team.
Hope I'll still have same opinion after Tuesday 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
