Paolo ArdoinoVerified account

Then why you write a click-bait article without giving your reader a link to the paper? https://twitter.com/lawmaster/status/1191270063350960128 …

It’s newsworthy - we want to give our readers access to all available information. If they don’t read it on The Block, they will read it on Bloomberg so what’s the difference? I don’t even make the calls on what gets covered btw

Shouldn't you level up the quality and ethics rather then level yourself to bloomberg?

As long as both sides of the argument are presented (which they were), it’s fair game to report on it IMO. When the paper wasn’t peer reviewed, it was a little bit different but Journal of Finance is a prestigious journal. If it’s nonsense, we will report on that too

Sure. Did not say do not report stuff, just if you report something you should give complete information to the public, otherwise to certain eyes might seem sloppy journalism . Just saying, and it's not only to me or my friends btw.

What do you think it’s missing? Happy to relay to the journalist

Am I not seeing it or the paper is not linked anywhere? I think it's kind of the most important thing to see no?

It's not published yet. And again, it's standard practice to report on yet to be published peer-reviewed papers if they are exclusively shared with a publication. This is not just a case for reporting on Tether. Check Bloomberg, WSJ, FT and others