Sure. But all the points say that. I mean “decreased risk” not no risk. Again I’m really not that passionate about this I just wanted to (1)
-
-
You don't want genital mutilation compared to ... genital mutilation? Why? Only women are worth of protection and men are disposable?https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Infibulation is the most extreme and rarest form of FGM. It's not just skin. The ridged band and frenulum are more sensitive than the glans and are excised as well. Stop being willfully ignorant. All the information is out there for you.
-
And yet you’ve posted no sources. explain what FGM you think is ok the
-
No genital mutilation of any kind is OK, male or female.
-
I’m not disagreeing. I’m just saying start your own thread. Don’t overshadow FGM with men’s issues
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I didn’t so I’m not sure why you continue to respond to me directly as if you’re expecting some type of reaction on the comparison of the two. And the two aren’t the same in terms of how people treat it and while I’m pro-choice, I can understand both sides because it involves -
-
You replied to the response I had to the original person. I assumed you were backing them up. But you did say all women here are trying to(1
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How is
#FGM Type 4 not compareable to#circumcision? https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation …pic.twitter.com/3JEgp7leI7
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
