Results of the poll! Most people think game points are the most important points to work for. I’ll argue that, instead, 30-30/deuce is most likely the right answer! Here is a thread for tennis lovers on insights from game theory.https://twitter.com/page_eco/status/1222451143860604930 …
-
-
Thanks for the thread. I'm struggling to understand why a player dedicates less effort when behind in your toy game. Since the game is zero sum (payoffs are symmetrical), why isn't their effort also symmetrical? Am I missing a condition? 1/
-
(I can see why *both* would dedicate less effort when one player leads.) 2/2
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Interesting. Haven’t read the paper. Based on the same idea, when receiving 0/40 you should put more effort than serving 40/0 right?
-
Yes that is right! A server at 40-0 is less likely to be caught up than a receiver at 0-40. So the point is more important for the receiver.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Did you find this relationship was similar to those seen in animal behaviour? (The winner and loser effect)?
-
Yes they are (roughly).
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.