It’s outrageous that liberals are using boycotts against a woman and calling it “more speech.” Everyone knows “more speech” against a woman means inciting your oily subterranean incels to email death threats to her and then arguing that she’s too sensitive.
-
-
Replying to @Popehat
Er - can someone please explain this tweet? I know who Ingraham is. It just seems like there is a reference I haven't seen or a joke I am not getting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There is an unfortunate history in the less savory corners of online of relatively high profile skeevy dudes getting angry at random women and attacking them in such a fashion that a bunch of their followers decide to dogpile, frequently going past the bounds of legality.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Absofuckin',and thanks. But are there liberals being shitty to Ingraham in the same way that the incel hordes treat Laurie Penny or Lauren Duca or Anita S.? Or is the first sentence ironic sarcasm to point up the absence of such?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.