I'm not attacking Sarah Jeong. I'm attacking the Times' decision to hire her. It's basically a complete admission by them that they are overtly biased and it supports Trump's claims of the Times being fake news. Why did they do that, especially now of all times?
most of the people attacking sarah jeong are the same ones sending all of us who are nonwhite on twitter the threatening messages that we have to report.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You’re wrong, and you should be attacking her too. Her hate rhetoric will not help anything, it will just get Trump re-elected. How can you not see that? Putin is thrilled with her hiring
-
I could not help but notice some common sense emanating from that tweet, are you sure you’re not conservative? I hope that soon you too can walk away :)
-
No, I still consider myself liberal, but when I read tweets like Sarah Jeong’s, I get nudged just a wee bit to the right.
-
I think a lot of people are experiencing that, it’s not that you are changing, just the whole progressive movement has gone so far left and left you behind.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Correction: She is the one sending racist messages to people that they have to report.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this sounds like the nuanced explanation we can expect from
@jack in explaining how what looks like blatant racism is actually "healthy conversation" & how what looks like healthy conversation is actually blatant racism, depending on the ideology of the person making the commentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lot of blocked accounts in responses about this.
-
Same
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Looks like she made her comments along the line of those directed at her but will be changing that approach. Nazis will be all over her every past tweet as a result along with the other racist du jur.pic.twitter.com/zKibOhxtVa
-
No, it looks like SHE CLAIMS THAT. But she has provided no evidence that she was responding to anyone, and many of her racist tweets are context free. Your rationalization of this behavior makes you as big a racist as she is.
-
Most of those tweets aren’t even replies, they’re straight up posts!
-
I don't know if they still exist,but if/when some enterprising person goes and finds the full context, the next rationalization (already fully formed in the leftists mind) will be: she was responding to the atmosphere of the dominant, "racist" culture. Hints here already.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No , stop trying to look like the victim here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Racists hacked her account and tweeted out those racist tweets from her? Interesting claim. Do you have any evidence for the hacking? And why didn't she claim she was hacked earlier?
Oh, you meant your racism is the "good racism".
Sorry... There is no good racism.
Try again?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most of the people NOT calling out Sarah on her racist tweets are the same ones that called out Roseanne for being "Racist" (Comparing someone to a TV show character). Which ended up in her losing her show.
#DoubleStandardThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She seems pretty mean-spirited to me.
-
She was trying to troll back at racists harassing her, and didn't think through stufc like how it might make others feel.
-
I understand the context. I wouldn't hire her.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.