So I've made the decision to keep my hearthstone video up. I stand by it. The main criticism I'm getting is that the game needs the classic set to not be too powerful but they're missing my point.
I agree that the cards are too weak, but have you seen Kibler's argument that the idea of a classic set is fundamentaly bad, and a rotating core set will solve these problems?
-
-
No but I (sort of) agree. You can achieve the same thing a rotating classic set would achieve by making the classic set only good for their synergies. There by they only see play when an archetype that supports them is around and the meta doesn't get stale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.