Great. Number 429. Show me where Jesus said he was talking about the literal temple building in Jerusalem as the false witnesses claimed. Number 96. Show me where the Bible requires gentiles to be circumcised in order to be saved.
-
-
If they're clearly refuted, then why have you so far been unable to refute them (and we're discussing just one of literally hundreds of contradictions). BTW: You can't use the Bible to validate accuracy of the Bible!
-
Yet you can use it to verify the inaccuracies!! Ahahahahhahahah You lose.
-
I (or anyone) can use the Bible to verify the clear self-contradictions in the Bible. That's just logic Tim and it's impossible for you (or anyone) to refute. You haven't answered any question, stayed on point or debunked anything, but yeah, I lose
You're not very good at this. -
If somebody claims something is both black and white that doesn't mean it's grey IT MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL. The non definitive contrary to both white & black is grey which only non verifies (is a zero observation) of both.
-
Is it absurd to realize that too many atheists have never argued from facts nor logic but only from their own rage as they mock & insult and think they have won purely on the basis that we cannot prove a God who is bigger than the entire Universe.pic.twitter.com/s3tGm9yXQM
-
Just crap! For the 1000th time: just to remain self consistent to creationism a God has to be created by an even greater God to infinity. This is called an inductive infinite regress (IIR). It requires infinite information (an Omni) so it has no solution.
@rdfs@RichardDawkins - 93 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Muslims attempt the
#GetOut where, if earlier verses are contradicted by later versions only the later verses stand. My bank manager once tried that one on with my bank statements...without even wincing.. Self consistency cannot be sacrificed on the alter of belief. -
Sucks for you. Unfortunately, the site claims the Bible and didn’t differentiate between OT and NT. (Because whoever put it together has the knowledge of a four year old).
-
And yet, you haven't managed to debunk even one of it's hundreds of citations.
-
you didn’t even try to refute the temple one. You just ignored it entirely. -
Why do you need me to show you screenshots from the site or look up Bible passages for you. Are you unable to do that yourself? Anyway, show me how the Bible doesn't contradict itself. So far, you have been unable to do that.
-
Just a heads up. Tim will evade and obfuscate and finally retreat into "you're just imposing a philosophical slant on things" He really finds it hard to debate honestly. I think he got hurt in a previous thread and still carries the psychological scars
-
Yeah, I noticed that he's unable to; (a) answer questions (b) provide verifiable facts (c) stick to the point His debating skills amount to saying "I win" and random points in the debate. The 'pigeon playing chess' analogy comes to mind ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.