Show me a single baby who died because he wasn't circumcised. In contrast, I can show you many who died because they were: http://www.cirp.org/library/death/
-
-
Replying to @opticon9
9% to 36% mortality rate in infants https://www.medicinenet.com/sepsis/article.htm … and 20-30% of sepsis is from UTI
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
Stop deliberately misleading the statistics to claim things they don't claim. That mortality rate refers to sepsis in general, not from UTIs.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
And 20-30% is from UTI. I clearly am unable to do math this late, so you do it for me please
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @opticon9
Stop with the ad hominem this late defender of reason
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
Says the guy vomiting out red herrings and misrepresenting statistics to provide a warped view in favor of genital mutilation. Cute.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
Hahahaha it was a math error other than that I'm giving you so many studies that you could have a field day
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
A "math error" of 41.8 million people in defense of butchering innocent males. "ha ha ha", so funny.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
Just by the way, isn't saying I'm defending the butchering of innocent males strawmanning me? Don’t answer, it is. So stop suggesting therapeutic circumcision for genuine medical concerns is butchery, or I’ll get confused as to whether you want it banned or not again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, because that's the consequences of your position. You're overstating the necessity of thereaputic circumcision, disingenuously intimating that foreskins lead to UTIs, that UTIs lead to sepsis, and sepsis lead to death, therefore "42 million will die!". Meanwhile, girls...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.