Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
opticon9's profile
opticon9
opticon9
opticon9
@opticon9

Tweets

opticon9

@opticon9

agent of good, enforcer of reason

#i2 #SaveKinect #SaveXboxWP
projectspark.com
Joined July 2013

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 19
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      Neither of those studies controlled for iatrogenic harm. They're garbage studies.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 19
      Replying to @opticon9

      “They’re garbage studies” - a Twitter user. I guess they’re discredited. The number of infections that are iatrogenic in that number is so small that they make no difference. Prove me wrong.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 19
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      I explained to you exactly why they're flawed. "Prove me wrong." The onus is on you. That's the burden of proof. You're the one arguing for invasive surgery, not me.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 19
      Replying to @opticon9

      No, you’re the one criticising two medical studies with evidence because they “disagree with you”. And saying they’re objectively wrong. If they are, find someone discrediting them, which would prove me wrong. It’s not like the burden of proof joke with the bible.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 19
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      No, I criticized them because they failed to control for iatrogenesis, a fatal flaw.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 19
      Replying to @opticon9

      It isn’t a fatal flaw, it’s a control variable. A fatal flaw would be a fundamental issue with the independent or dependant variable.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 19
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      You need to sign up for Stats 101. Failling to control for a variable proven to affect the outcome invalidates the study. It's fatal.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
      Replying to @opticon9

      It seems like every time you tell me to “go do a course on stats” you say something wrong. The only example of a “fatal flaw” in medical research is something that can’t be corrected with a later study, like studying the wrong variable (e.g. concluding that firemen cause fires).

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      I've said nothing wrong when it comes to statistics, trust me there. You didn't even understand the basic core statistical principle of a "representative sample" and you cited methodologically flawed studies as fact. You seriously exposed yourself as an ignoramus of basic stats.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
      Replying to @opticon9

      You’ve consistently repeated language that isn’t even in statistical discourse, and at best is a throw-away comment by a hearing doctor. You also seem to think that 2% of 100 is larger than 1% of 1000, because “2>1”. You ignored a statistic because you wanted a case study.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
      Replying to @_Undersized_

      It's mind-boggling to me that you still don't understand basic math. I'll simply it for you, again: The risk rate of circumcision is such that you cause more problems than you prevent.

      9:28 AM - 21 Oct 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
          Replying to @opticon9

          2 is not larger than 10. I even simplified the problem for you.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
          Replying to @_Undersized_

          The risk of infection caused by circumcision is at least double the risk of infection by not circumcising. You literally cause more harm than you prevent.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
          Replying to @opticon9

          Once again, the 2% of circumcised men is a smaller real number than 1% of the entire male population of earth

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
          Replying to @_Undersized_

          Once again, 0% of circumcised men is the smallest real number.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
          Replying to @opticon9

          What did you mean by this?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
          Replying to @_Undersized_

          It means that 100% of circucmsions cause guaranteed harm by ablating functional tissue, which you keep dangerously and dishonestly failing to include in your crappy cost-benefit analyses.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. lmao‏ @_Undersized_ Oct 21
          Replying to @opticon9

          I just don’t think it’s ok to weigh up a baby’s life against some swollen tissue.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. opticon9‏ @opticon9 Oct 21
          Replying to @_Undersized_

          Show me a single baby who died because he wasn't circumcised. In contrast, I can show you many who died because they were: http://www.cirp.org/library/death/ 

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        10. 24 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info