You know what it does yet your entire cost-benefit calculation completely fails to include its loss.
-
-
Replying to @opticon9
I had one. I no longer have one. I had a medical reason to remove it. I don't particularly care about it's loss. I was given an informed decision at 14. I chose to lose it. I still feel about the same. If you’re that bothered by a bit more feeling and some lubrication...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
I have no interest in your life story. I'm only interested in preventing medically unnecessary surgery from being imposed on kids.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @opticon9
Cool, glad we agree. I mean you wanted a case study. I actually just realised, I am the case study. Haha, your own case study you wanted disagrees with you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
You're not the case study. You were old enough to consent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @opticon9
Actually I could only provide informal consent, I wasn’t 16.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
Parental consent + informed assent on the part of the minor. That's the key.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @opticon9
No, now you’re changing the goalposts. I fit the description. And I can say with certainty that I am glad to be rid of the constantly infection-riddled, painful part of flesh there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Undersized_
You don't fit the description. No goalposts were moved. This was always about medically unnecessary surgery imposed on non-consenting kids and your unsubstantiated fear mongering.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @opticon9
I mean, I didn’t consent, but you said it doesn’t count now. Isn’t that moving goalposts? And no, you wanted a case where it was medically necessary. It was. So there. Case studies, surveys, research papers. Circumcision shouldn’t be totally banned. I’m pretty sure we agree.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, that's not what I asked for. I asked for statistics demonstrating the prevalence of "chronic infections" caused by a foreskin in infants that could not be treated via less invasive means and required a circumcision. You have none.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.