Then there's bare Article II constitutional authority to consider. Obama was reluctant to rely on bare constitutional authority for good reason. It properly applies in very limited circumstances where there is an imminent attack and no time for congressional debate. 5/
-
-
A few readings that might be helpful to those seeking context: I wrote this on how to revive congressional war powers: 16/ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3436924 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
This article is about states operating with consent in another state (a different focus, but still potentially useful): 17/https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol165/iss1/1/ …
Prikaži ovu nit -
This on earlier drums of war with Iran 18/:https://www.justsecurity.org/64372/john-boltons-stated-predicate-for-war-with-iran-doesnt-work-proxies/ …
Prikaži ovu nit -
My book with
@scottshapiro explains why the prohibition on the use of force, which is embodied in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, lies at the core of the modern international legal system and therefore undermining it could prove catastrophic. 19/:https://www.amazon.com/Internationalists-Radical-Outlaw-Remade-World/dp/1501109863 …Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It also poses a new challenge to the ban on assassination. US practice has progressively undermined the ban, excluding non-state terrorist actors from the remit of the ban, but in this case we are dealing with a state official.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.