@onedroptoday how can readings be vastly different? 240 is not even close to recent. 87 vs 106 isn’t close either.pic.twitter.com/QSasrx7s4X
-
1)
@jnelson518 sorry to see that you're experiencing difficulty! That does fall within the 20% range of variability approved by the@US_FDA. You can check out an in-depth look at BGM accuracy here: https://onedrop.today/2018/02/05/accuracy-blood-glucose-meter/ …
2) Here's a short breakdown: with 86mg/dL, you could be +20 (106mg/dL) or -20 (66mg/dL); with 100mg/dL, you could be +20 (120mg/dL) or -20 (80mg/dL). All fall within that 20% range of variability.
-
-
Doesn’t seem right if measurement is within the same minute. It has been fluctuating more and more recently.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
3) For further reference, the
@DiabetesTechSoc came out with a report last year on BGM accuracy. Our meter (manufactured by@AgaMatrix) came in at #4; only 6 meters passed (out of 18). You can check out the full report here: https://www.diabetestechnology.org/surveillance.shtml … -
4) We have control solution headed your way, and we are happy to jump on the phone with you to discuss this further! If your meter fails the control solution test(s), we are more than happy to overnight you a new meter
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.