I don’t know if the writing world needs another American Dirt thread, but I got conned by the folks behind this book’s marketing and I’m mad about it, so for whatever it’s worth, here’s some details about how this thing was presented to the world…
-
-
As a result, they’ve wiped any trace of the original review from their web site. A somewhat forgettable book that in any other year would have come and gone is now the subject of attention that isn’t being given to countless authors who deserve it more.
Prikaži ovu nit -
And all of this because some publisher decided this book had to be a phenomenon at any cost. I hope these folks are aware of how much long-term damage they’ve done, and I’m sorry I helped them do it.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What is the point of a no-negative-review policy? Are we children?!
-
Re. Your interview in Paris. I read 'Ducks' in bed. The Biblioasis edition opens well. It sits on a cushion and the cushion sits on my chest.
Looking forward to seeing the French translation and how the subjunctives work. Best from Vancouver.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As a reviewer myself I'm mad for you too. We work with the titles we are assigned on a speedy turnaround assuming a level of good faith even as we critically evaluate. Your trust was violated.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I genuinely don’t understand the no-negative-review. Maybe I’m confused, but isn’t the whole point to honestly comment as an experienced reader? If not, why bother taking your time to review it?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.