Oliver Darcy@oliverdarcyReplying to @oliverdarcyHere's the before and after of the two paragraphs from the @nytimes editorial3:02 PM · Jun 15, 2017167 Retweets58 Quote Tweets173 Likes
Paul Burrer@paulburrer·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesSince the editorial was primarily built around a falsehood, shouldn't nyt issue a retraction instead of correction? @Poynter12
rainy gay redux@dacheteur·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesWhen are they going to issue corrections for all the false climate change claims to be published?3
TheFracDog@TheFracDog·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesGreat. Now they link it to Palin by saying it was never linked to Palin. Somewhere, George Orwell is smiling. Way to go, NYPravda !621
Christopher Woods@kingcwoods·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesI don't get it. They're still attributing the shooting to Sarah Papin14
Rob Eno@Robeno·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesSo they still imply it is Sarah's fault by employing the high journalistic standard of "some people said"621112
some guy@donny319·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @Robeno @oliverdarcy and @nytimesThat means MSNBC is responsible for yesterday? You mean they inspire terrorism????11
hierodula @hierodula·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesthe paragraph makes no sense. They kept their topic sentence and now have no supporting argument.16
Lady L. North @LadyLNorth·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @oliverdarcy and @nytimesA correction w/o an actual correction. Still smearing Palin, while pretending not to. What a bunch of hacks.117
Eric Hoffer@red_thor1911·Jun 15, 2017Replying to @LadyLNorth @oliverdarcy and @nytimesThey could care less about Palin, they are smearing you and me and they intend to.1