They will believe whatever their God Emperor will tell them to believe.
Fox can't get its story straight: While one host zings Trump for taking hydorxychloroquine, another host encourages its use. While one medical contributor calls it "highly irresponsible," another says it's "reasonable." What are viewers to believe? http://cnn.it/36j4oSE
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Fox isn't supposed to tell the viewers what to believe. Presenting all sides is their job. The viewers need to think for themselves. A lost art.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
It’s almost as if they are fairly covering all angles like a real news organization.
-
That is laying out different views, media should not spread agenda, or recommendation to taking or not taking of any drug or treatment. Its good to see that you are fair to them on having a host that says it's "highly irresponsible". Drugs should be discussed with doctors
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Viewers who care about accuracy shouldn’t be watching FoxNews in the first place, should they?
-
Fox isn't perfect, but neither is CNN.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
"What are viewers to believe?" The viewer will draw his or her own conclusion. You have been working for CNN for too long.
-
People can’t draw their own conclusions about the efficacy of a drug.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Hmm. Maybe different people have different opinions. I know that's hard to understand over there at CNN, but I trust you'll figure it out eventually.
-
It's not a hypothesis, it's proven. Science. So, one is telling the truth, the other is lying.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.