Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ole_b_peters

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ole_b_peters

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    29. srp 2017.

    Hi. Ergodicity takes the story out of history.

    Poništi
  2. prije 19 sati

    As a starting point: the Cramer dynamic is derived on p.7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 20 sati

    Interested in developing ergodicity economics? Explore the less common dynamics, for instance Cramer dynamics. What’s the optimal leverage here? Hint: what exactly does it mean to leverage or “keep money safe” under this dynamic? Fun because it’s neither linear nor Kelly.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    Insightful passage by and Solomon (2010). Something that gives physicists some credibility in my eyes is that their opinions tend to converge, even if different teams work independently. ht

    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    EE project, anyone? The beginning of this post may be familiar, but at the end muses about evolution. There are various ways of setting this up. Offspring could inherit risk preferences, or cooperation strategies... Give it a go?

    Poništi
  6. 30. sij

    Working with and to turn the into teaching notes and coding exercises for the .

    Poništi
  7. 30. sij

    Rajiv, I agree with you. It was meant as a joke. A reviewer made a mistake (happens in all fields), and the editor didn't spot it (happens in all fields). I found it funny to find out our paper should have been rejected because its result was already established in physics.

    Poništi
  8. 29. sij

    Mathematical results, peer-reviewed and published in physics journals contradict economics. Economics journals reject them as mathematically wrong. Either physicists or economists don’t know how to do maths. Which is it?

    Poništi
  9. 28. sij

    Statement Hey, something basic is wrong with expected-utility theory. Response 50%: Idiot! Everyone knows it's wrong! Impostor! Plagiarist! We've always known this! 50%: Liar! Nothing is wrong with EUT! We've proved that! All of economics has been based on it for 300 years!

    Poništi
  10. 26. sij

    Let's retweet this for people interested in doing something EE related. Interested in emergence of structure and cooperation? Take our starting point and go a few steps further. (Needless to say: rejected by classic journal because we don't compute the expectation value🤦)

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij
    Poništi
  12. 25. sij
    Poništi
  13. 25. sij

    Hey Australians — get in touch with Sebastian.

    Poništi
  14. 24. sij

    Each bite, each word. Lunch outside of time. Eye to eye. “You have to eat well, and sleep well, and have fun. One last handshake.” We shook hands knowingly. Rest in peace my dear friend Reuben Hersh.

    Poništi
  15. 24. sij
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Are you excited by ergodicity economics? Interested-but-agnostic-given-the-available-evidence? Think it’s BS? Are you a postgrad + free this July? Do you like everything paid for? Apply for the London Math Lab summer school + come work with us on an exciting experiment. 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 22. sij

    Truth is a bit like love, or a . Serious cases overcome the obstacles in their way.

    Poništi
  18. 20. sij

    "The devil is in the detail." Physicists are often accused of ignoring details. Not so. They just don't worship that particular devil.

    Poništi
  19. 20. sij

    Some people think it's important to understand where economic inequality comes from. Editors of economics journals generally don't, apparently. So don't read economics journals. Here's a paragraph from our lecture notes, with .

    Poništi
  20. 20. sij

    Good idea. Hey : is over-rated. I mean: 145 followers, just because he did the most impressive bachelor project ever? Come on! Let’s see if that works.

    Poništi
  21. 20. sij

    ...and remember: do not follow . He has far too many followers already.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·