Amazingly, this is the first time I have encountered Newcomb’s Paradox. Is there a succinct way of explaining why it is an interesting problem? I understand it’s formulation, but fail, as yet, to see the significance beyond illustrating importance of hidden assumptions.
-
-
-
Your question is impossible to do justice within a single tweet, but the NP touches on thorny issues in, e.g., rationality, the fundamentals of decision theory, causality, artificial intelligence and whether we might possibly be living in a computer simulation.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Jag TYCKTE jag kände igen ditt namn! Skulle precis fråga om du läst Johan Wästlunds blogg om Newcomb och där står ju ditt namn! http://wastlund.blogspot.com/2016/04/newcombs-lador-ar-du-en-enb-eller-en.html?m=1 …
-
Han har en relaterad bloggpost från 2018 om en självkörande bil som kör mot rött ljus "for the hell of it". Jag skrev om den i förrgår, i mitt halvfärdiga bokmanus.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I am a self-proclaimed one-boxer, but definitely not because I am trying to trick anyone, let alone the predictor.
-
They all say that.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.