at the end of #Consensus2016, John emerged out from the shadow of a large column and complained about enterprises. and when I pointed out that Bitcoin couldn't do the things he claims it could, walked away. guess we now know why he held those inconsistent views:pic.twitter.com/nOxMbqOnqP
-
-
-
i don't have an affinity with Bitcoin Cash. i was commenting on the fact that maximalists and Core sycophants don't care about "the whitepaper" yet simultaneously pretend to understand the needs of enterprises. what diligence did John or others do on FMI?
-
1: You're generalizing an entire group of people. 2: How are those two things even contradictory to each other? One acknowledges the flaws in the initial proof of concept, the other assumes "we" as a group are pretending to know what we're talking about.
-
at the time John and many other vocal maximalists were saying that Bitcoin itself should be used as the only blockchain-of-choice as FMI. it is "chain maximalism" which doesn't make sense because Bitcoin wasn't designed to be compliant FMI. and as a result, it can't be used.
-
Where do the maximalists state Bitcoin was a useful PoC but it didn't work out? Is there a site that compiles those admissions?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fuck blue checks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.