Wow. Former Austrian chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer was part of Paul Manafort’s lobbying campaign on behalf of Viktor Yanukovych, according to new filings made public by special counsel Robert Mueller. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/paul-manafort-mueller-probe-washington-lobbying-ukraine-austria-423439 …
It is, because Manafort is a US citizen, so Sec. 101 (b)(2) applies to him, not Sec. 101 (b)(1). Therefore violation of US criminal statute is required for a FISA warrant to be issued. I have quoted Sec. 101 (b) in full above so you can easily check for yourself.
-
-
Ok. Read closer: "which activities involve or are about to involve a violation of the criminal statues of the US." "About to involve" implies the court is clairvoyant?? Not likely. Apparently it's a low bar to meet. Still can't use info in criminal court.
-
Ad. "may involve": Yes. It is a low bar. But that's nothing new about FISA.. Ad. use in criminal court: Again, assuming you are talking about the results of the wiretap (or whatever the FISA warrant was for): I never said that they could. That's a strawman argument. See above.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.