Wow. Former Austrian chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer was part of Paul Manafort’s lobbying campaign on behalf of Viktor Yanukovych, according to new filings made public by special counsel Robert Mueller. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/paul-manafort-mueller-probe-washington-lobbying-ukraine-austria-423439 …
-
-
Replying to @oe1cxw
Even if this is true, Mueller's sloppy handling of the Manafort investigation, exceeding his special counsel authority, pulling Manafort out of bed at gunpoint, searching his wife (in night gown) for weapons, etc., is likely going to cause the whole cause to be thrown out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zipcpu
Really? Did a pundit on Fox News say that? </sarcasm> The FBI is investigating Manafort since 2014. Among other things they had enough on him to get a FISA warrant. They even had enough to convince a judge to issue a warrant for a no-knock raid, which they lawfully executed.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @oe1cxw
Your ignorance of the FISA court is showing. (See wikipedia) FISA warrants are not criminal warrants, nor could they be. The fact of a FISA warrant is therefore not evidence of a crime, but more likely an abuse of the court. But, yes, we'll see how this plays out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zipcpu
To get a FISA warrant against a US citizen ("United States person") the law enforcement agency must convince the judge that there is reason to believe the target was knowingly engaging in clandestine intelligence activities for a foreign power that violate American criminal laws.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Only for "any person other than a United States person" a FISA warrant can be issued without reason to believe that American criminal law is violated. 92 Stat. 1783 Title I Sec. 101 (b)(2).pic.twitter.com/rul5ShAC0W
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oe1cxw
The FISA court therefore is not about prosecuting US persons, but rather as its name implies its purpose is to facilitate the gathering of intelligence on FOREIGN powers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zipcpu
This is a strawmen. I did not say that FISC is about prosecuting US persons. I said you can't get a FISA warrant on a US person without being able to demonstrate that there is reason to believe that the US person is violating US criminal law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oe1cxw
"Acting as an agent of a foreign power" is not equivalent to violating US criminal law. Many foreign governments hire US lobbyists. This in itself isn't a crime.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The legal FISA definition of "agent of a foreign power", that I quoted above for your convenience, says that in order for a US citizen to be categorized as "agent of a foreign power" wrt FISA that person must be in violation of US criminal law. Just read Sec. 101 (b)(2)!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.