We had seven projects in DARPA POSH and one in IDEA. DARPA did not fund a single one of them. I'm afraid it's because they think we will self exploit ourselves like always and develop that stuff "for free" anyways. 1/4
Show this thread
-
Clifford, it well may be that the FLOSS party inside DARPA just lost. In our proposals we explained our view that what they call "viral" license is a better choice for both DoD and taxpayers who fund it.
Our proposed projects would all have been permissively licensed, i.e. licensed exactly the way they asked. (And I am usually not a fan of copyleft. I just need a viral license if I want to implement the kind of restrictions that seem reasonable in this situation.)
-
-
I am fan of GPL and GPL+CERN OHL are our (Elphel) only licenses. And now I know that agreeing to "permissive" would not help our proposals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.