After Meltdown and Spectre, giant 6502 processors don't seem so silly now, do they?
-
-
Replying to @EMSL
How about a giant RISC-V implementation? Curious how complicated a PICORV32 out of transistors would be. :D CC
@oe1cxw On serious note this is another proof that openness, peer review and formal verification of the silicon that runs our lives is important1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
To address your curiosity: I just naively mapped a small PicoRV32 config to NOT (2T), NAND (4T), NOR (4T), and DFF (12T) with Yosys. Looks like it would be approximately 77000 transistors with CMOS gates.
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
That would be 40.5 hours just placing the discrete transistors on my PNP. Sounds like fun. Alternative would be going one up and using nand gates or so :) I know it is not the same…
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
To give you some reference ARM6 was in the low 20k transistor range, ARM 7 the high 20k transistor range if I recall correctly. Can't recall the 68k transistor count now. Full custom design flow of course, not standard cell.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
According to multiple sources online, ARM 6 had 30k transistors and ARM 7 had 58k transistors. The 68k famously had 68k transistors.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Your ARM numbers are high. I want to say 21K and 28K but it's too long ago and I may have my rose tinted glasses on, ARM6 was certainly <30K. Your ARM7 number maybe from a later softcore. 68K sounds ballpark.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
- http://www.wagnercg.com/Portals/0/FunStuff/AHistoryofMicroprocessorTransistorCount.pdf … - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count#Microprocessors … - https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~theom/riscos/docs/ultimate/a252arm6.txt … - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture#Early_licensees … I'd say "ARM6 was certainly <30K" is certainly false. ;)pic.twitter.com/8W801NE6pO
-
-
Your 3rd link is the $$$, DaveJ was living ARM6 24/7 in 1991, so that is a definitive answer.....and my memory is proven to be definitively failing. Nice pic of ARM610 in the wiki link though! It was a mad scramble to get that sucker to Apple for the Newton development.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.