Discuss: Which version is "better" and why? How would you solve this?pic.twitter.com/KLuwMPRsoo
Neurodiverse trans geek girl. Yosys, RISC-V, SAT/SMT.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
Discuss: Which version is "better" and why? How would you solve this?pic.twitter.com/KLuwMPRsoo
I wish I knew. with blind ignorance I'd see which took the fewest LUTs
Depending on your target arch that would probably either be "check_en", or it wouldn't matter. But would you know what it does if you read it in someones code? Would you be able to spot an error?
There is no error. I've formally verified the three versions for logical equivalence. But the question is if you would spot one if the code would have a bug.
I believe what the human think it does is less relevant. Regressions need to be in place, there is no way around simulation. Making it scalable, or adding concurrent assertions may be valid improvements.
Simulation is nice but I prefer to formally verify things whenever I can. The only way to be sure.
So far I’ve only used formal verification to validate implementation, here reference is always simulated. Are you suggesting/using formal from spec to RTL? Would like to know more...cheers 
In this case I simply verified the other implementations against _ref for equivalence. (The whole check_en stuff is part of another formal proof.) See http://svn.clifford.at/handicraft/2017/wormux/ ….
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.