You might give it away for free to some, but this is not open source anymore. See 5. and 6. of the OSD: https://opensource.org/osd-annotated
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Its not about compliance with the OSD, but about surviving as a commercial entity with a business model that allows code based cooperation.
You are refuting an argument that I didn't make. All I said is that you can't call it open source unless you comply with the OSD.
-
-
+1. Seen this time and again where people say "open source but non-commercial". No, that is something, but it is not open source. OSD!
-
We were at that situation on MAME emulation project. Due to fact that commercial use was prohibited we were just "source available".
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And my point you replied to was that you *can* adhere to OSD while effectively selecting a large audience who feels they need to pay to use.
-
Because of both culture and "need' to use other third party libraries they can't GPL.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.