do they simulate building blocks of newer FPGAs in older FPGAs?
-
-
Replying to @whitequark
how many levels of FPGA can you put in the largest Virtex-7 before you only have space for one 2-LUT?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
unrelated question, would someone here be willing to give me the largest Virtex-7
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
If anyone is giving those out, I'd like one also. I'd even settle for the second- or third-largest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brouhaha @whitequark
In exchange for reversing it? Any day! Just tell me.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ico_TC @whitequark
I'm willing to devote some time and effort to reverse-engineering FPGAs, but certainly wouldn't start with the biggest.
5 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
I think reverse-engineering even the smallest Spartan 6 or Artix 7 FPGAs would be very worthwhile.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Spartan 6 is a dead end by this point. anything from series 7 is sensible though
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
(well, a good chunk of S6 is reversed by Wolfgang Spraul already, even with some very hacky code)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @whitequark @ico_TC
Has Wolfgang Spraul published his S6 reverse-engineering results? Presumably 7-series is not completely dissimilar.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Wolfgang Spraul's work on xc6slx9: https://github.com/Wolfgang-Spraul/fpgatools …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.