Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
oe1cxw's profile
Claire Xen 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🧙🏻‍♀️ BLM 🏴🚩
Claire Xen 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🧙🏻‍♀️ BLM 🏴🚩
Claire Xen  🏳️‍⚧️ 🏳️‍🌈 🧙🏻‍♀️ BLM  🏴 🚩
@oe1cxw

Tweets

Claire Xen  🏳️‍⚧️ 🏳️‍🌈 🧙🏻‍♀️ BLM  🏴 🚩

@oe1cxw

Neurodiverse trans geek girl. Yosys, RISC-V, SAT/SMT.

She/her/hers
clairexen.net
Joined September 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The liveness trace starts a multiply less than 32 cycles before end-of-test, and trips an assertion because no more instructions retire. Yup... that's what happens... Think this is a test configuration problem, but the docs are not so illuminating (or I need to find right part)pic.twitter.com/ETlEQHY2fQ

      1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Config problem, need to allow space between trigger cycle and check cycle for your longest-running instruction to retire. Now it is just holding the bus stall forever? Thought I had some bus fairness constraints in placepic.twitter.com/vGJcJ6amtp

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Solvers are weird "Does my processor corrupt its instruction fetch?" -> writes flawless 10 instruction RISC-V program without ever reading the spec "Does my processor lock up?" -> stalls bus forever, is this good, do you like this

      1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Keep extending the BMC depth, and the solver finds new combinations of multiplies, bus stalls and branch mispredicts that make my processor stall for that long. Currently at 100 cycle check bound (with trigger at cycle 25), max bus stall 20 cycles

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    5. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Am I so out of touch? No! It is the solver that is wrong!pic.twitter.com/e9eB3SDrmT

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    6. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Well there is something going on here... lots of bus activity but no instructions retiring. Any bets on this being another monitor bugpic.twitter.com/biriWpyEDa

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    7. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      So this trace features - Issuing loads before branches so the load data phase can extend the jump data phase - Issuing multiplies in the mispredict path of the same branch - Issuing invalid opcodes *inside an invalid opcode trap* All at once, breathtaking

      1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      So far I have learned: - I should hook up that kill signal on the multiplier so that mispredicts aren't quite so painful - I REALLY need to implement double fault condition

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Some big brain thinking on RISC-V mailing lists: no need to have a double fault lockup, because this is a software bugpic.twitter.com/UNiFC5BqPL

      1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Trawling through the latest RISC-V privileged spec, and I still can't find the behaviour of illegal opcodes inside the illegal opcode handler. Nested exceptions are very loose in general, although the model for nested IRQs seems ok This is the gap riscv-formal is poking at

      3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
      Show this thread
      Claire Xen  🏳️‍⚧️ 🏳️‍🌈 🧙🏻‍♀️ BLM  🏴 🚩‏ @oe1cxw 29 Feb 2020
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @wren6991

      It's just a horizontal trap like any other. There is no special "inside illegal opcode handler state".

      8:39 PM - 29 Feb 2020
      • 1 Like
      • Luke Wren
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. Luke Wren‏ @wren6991 1 Mar 2020
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @oe1cxw

          Oh... wouldn't this trash mepc, so the first handler couldn't return? And it's up to *software* to figure out this is a double fault? mstatus.mie masks IRQs but not exceptions, right? Another example, store access fault handler is horizontal on M-only. What if SP gets trashed?pic.twitter.com/kPr7vkuY0W

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info