One of my biggest beefs about mathematical and engineering articles is the inclusion of equations without defining what (all) the terms mean. Wikipedia does this all the time, and as best I can see it’s actually worse than just writing random strings of nonsense.
I think that's because ppl are copying formulas from textbooks without fully understanding them (yet). I also remember the article for the Shockley equation describing the temperature dependency incorrectly bc the author didn't seem to understand I_s(T). But that's fixed now.
-
-
I_s = reverse bias saturation current T = temperature ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.