what the actual fuckhttps://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1199770512102047744 …
-
GNU is still dependent of the work of volunteers. A lot of GNU projects have dependencies to non GNU projects and it is absolutely valid to link to that projects IMO. I doubt that they can afford to switch to other projects just because some of them have questionable COCs.
Obviously one can have a dependency to another project without dedicating a page on ones own website to that other project. You are arguing a false binary here.
-
-
Yes, that's the way I and probably most people would do it, but honestly what's the difference? Granted, they have a dedicated page for the link, but still it is just a link. And they specifically mention that it is a non-GNU implementation.
-
The difference is that it looks like an endorsement. Like a semi-inclusion of Flex into the GNU project. If they (GNU) want it to be that way, fine, but then they shouldn't be surprised if people associate the GNU project with those other projects.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One last point on that: I agree to a certain extend that GNU could put pressure on flex because of their influence but writing a tweet and specifically blaming GNU for that is not OK imo. At least it should be corrected that it is a project often associated with GNU.
-
So you are saying that, yes, GNU could do something about this, but we should not put blame on them for not doing anything about it? Hmm..
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.