what the actual fuckhttps://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1199770512102047744 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yes, if you are linking to something saying only something along the lines of "here is some information you might find useful," then this is a kind of endorsement and you are willingly associating yourself with that other project to a certain degree. What else would it be?
The "I am not a horrible person, I am just friends with horrible people and see no reason whatsoever to do something about it"-defense is a pretty weak one imo. Especially for an influential organization like GNU.https://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1199810564093964293 …
GNU is still dependent of the work of volunteers. A lot of GNU projects have dependencies to non GNU projects and it is absolutely valid to link to that projects IMO. I doubt that they can afford to switch to other projects just because some of them have questionable COCs.
So what's the correct way of linking to another project then? Is it because the author is not mentioned?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.