hadn't realized I could dislike a slide this muchhttps://twitter.com/informusiccs/status/1199745085048606721 …
-
Ah, the experiment no-one likes to do! NIPS had a "shadow PC" for a while, I don't know if they published any of their data. I think the best data on this is: Conference Reviewing Considered Harmful https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~tom/support/confreview.pdf …
"We use game theory to show that with noisy reviews and zipf merit, authors have an incentive to submit papers too early and too often." I'm traveling this weekend. I think I know what I'll read on the plane..
-
-
It's a great paper and it's comments about strategy are profoundly depressing. This is why number of publications cannot be used as any kind of sane metric. For all its faults, the REF seems to be moving away from raw numbers, which is good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.