My answer to "implement fabs(), incorrectly". Seven and one third internet points to anyone who can say why it's incorrect, without looking up the spec. Hint: It's implementation defined. (Using C99 semantics because that's the only one I know reasonably well. :)https://twitter.com/oe1cxw/status/1144274172253822976 …
-
-
Replying to @oe1cxw
Does it treat NaNs incorrectly in some way? Alternately, might it return -0 sometimes?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @porglezomp
Only one of those two things is true. ;)
12:53 AM - 28 Jun 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.