Cognitive dissonance is fine. It is important to have the ability to detach an argument from oneself so that it can be reasoned from many perspectives. Unfortunately it gets let down by pigheaded folk who won’t consider or attempt to understand perspectives beyond their own.
Cognitive dissonance is a necessary part of the scientific process. Its absence would indicate that we are either done or stuck, and we are not done. What does it mean for science if people can have a whole career in it without ever having to learn how to deal with that feeling?https://twitter.com/skdh/status/1141203482969608192 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You also cannot reasonably have a civilised argument with someone in a power position such as a manager. It’s why funding is managed the way it is in academia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.