If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong.
If it is not testable by experiment it is irrelevant.https://twitter.com/ProfFeynman/status/1096840704104546305 …
-
-
Replying to @oe1cxw
So what would be irrelevant by this measure? The big bang, pangea, archeology, and on up all the way to evolution!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LUTs_Abound @oe1cxw
Oohh ... almost forgot, this measure makes all "climate change" science irrelevant as well
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LUTs_Abound
All of those are testable by experiment, and are tested by experiment all the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oe1cxw
Really? Cool, I must've missed an announcement or two. Can you point me to any articles demonstrating the ability to turn fish into reptiles?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LUTs_Abound @oe1cxw
I'd also love to read the report of the scientist who was able to verify/repeat the big bang in his lab
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What an amusing infantile understanding of this matters you have. Of course one doesn't need to "repeat the big bang in a lab" to have an experiment that verifies the big bang theory.
But I guess you know that and are just trolling. Go troll somewhere else little troll. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.