I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.pic.twitter.com/aceoeDRRQT
-
Well there isn't even evidence, I'd gladly settle for that. At higher and higher energies, it becomes less and less likely that the theory is right
What? There is plenty of observational evidence for dark matter. (And plenty that dismiss alternative explanations such as modified gravity.) However, re the OP I completely fail to see how that's a non-scientific problem. I'd say it's a very scientific one.
-
-
The point was that there is plenty of disagreement over scientific problems, and that even scientists disagree
-
Sure. But that doesn't mean that science as a method doesn't work. On the contrary: It provides a framework to refine and advance our understanding of the Cosmos. That includes that we sometimes find out a previous theory was incomplete.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.