You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You have a really strage definition of "prove" when it comes to your religion imo. A system of logic that applies one method to one source, and refuses to apply the same method to any other source is obviously inherently flawed.
The people (humans) who wrote the books in the bible obviously had no idea where the sun went at night and didn't know what stars are. Why would I believe their bronze-age stories about the nature and origin of the universe? They are simply not a reliable source.
Furthermore: Bronze-age moral philosophy is a joke! It's puzzling to me without end how anyone would look for moral guidence in a document that fails to condemn slavery and fails to condemn treating women as property.
And equally important: Why would I then not believe all other bronze-age stories to be equally true? How do you know King Unis did not hunt down gods to eat them? How do you know all the other bronze-age creation myths are wrong?
Bronze age? The Bible was written over the course of time between about 1500 BC (Bronze age) and 100 AD (long past the Bronze age). In my response, I referenced the history of Christ. Christ was born long after the Bronze age ended, yet He validates the writings of Moses.
What "history of Christ" are you even referring to? There is no tangible evidence for the existence of a historic Christ. But there is negative space that suggest no such person existed (e.g. the "cleansing of the Temple" narrative would be recorded in roman records, but isn't).
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
