ok so, try the following experiment. put boiling water into an *open* thermos flask. heat loss through conduction is minimal, so almost everything you see is heat loss due to water's immense heat of evaporation, and evaporate it does
-
-
-
a better idea is to time filling a container of a known volume with cold water, and then, without turning the knob, time filling the entire bathtub
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Alternative: Fill with water, add a known amount of a strong acid or base and measure resulting pH.
-
That's a horrible way of measuring the volume, even by comparison to my method. :P The resulting pH would always just be extremely close to 7. Much better: Add known quantity of NaCl and measure electric conductivity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Subtract leakage through the tub to the house inner walls
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure you're only half-kidding here, given your current lack of piped hot water, but what about ambient losses? ;) Maybe measure the rate of cooling too?
#pedantic - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Depending of the height of the power, your measurement will be a bit off, or a lot
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're missing important steps. Like stepping out of the bathtub before applying electricity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Physicists will do this: measure the length and width of the tube, calculate the mean, consider it the diameter of a perfect sphere, use the formula for its volume, call the discrepancy "experimental error" and write a paper about it.
-
I've got a great formula for predicting the results of horse races! Unfortunately it only works for spherical horses in vacuum..
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.