Fascinating story. A dispute between two groups of scientists ran for years because one had done simulations using buggy software that they didn't release with their paper. My conclusion: if the software isn't public, the paper shouldn't be published.https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20180822a/full/ …
-
Show this thread
Replying to @perrymetzger
imo: no source code or no raw data => no publication. But at the very least: If there are already contradicting claims about the behavior of *the same model*, then only claims backed by publicly available source code should be publishable. Everything else is just stupid.
3:32 AM - 29 Aug 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.